Many thanks to the History Hoydens for allowing me to guest
blog today. I don't have a blog of my own (not sure I want one), but sometimes
I just like to talk history with like-minded folks. So here I am.
I have a thing for carriages. I don't know why. I assume they were uncomfortable and
bone-rattling, no matter how well-sprung.
I would not particularly like to have to rely on one to get around. And yet, somehow I love them. I love picturing my characters seated in
them, or driving them. Especially the
sporting vehicles. The sports cars of
A couple of years ago I had the opportunity to visit the Carriage Museum
Greg and I were the only ones there, with the caretaker at our disposal,
patiently answering all my questions. I
was in hog heaven. I *so* wanted to be
able to climb into various carriages, to know what it felt like, to imagine
myself in a Regency gown trying gracefully to get in and out without showing
too much leg. As accommodating as the
caretaker was, he wouldn't go that far. Believe me, I asked!
I spent most of my time studying a curricle from the late
1790s. That's the one I most wanted to climb aboard, because so many of my
heroes have driven one, often with the heroine at his side.
A bit of background before I talk about this specific
The curricle, a two-wheeled open-air vehicle with a
collapsible hood, was first made in Italy. French carriage-makers
improved on the design, and it became extremely popular there in the early 18th
century. It took almost a century for it
to catch on in England,
where in the last years of the 18th century it began to supplant the four-wheeled
phaeton as the sporting vehicle of choice.
There were many reasons for the huge popularity of the
curricle. It was the only two-wheeled
carriage at the time that allowed two horses to be driven abreast. Instead of
one horse driven between a pair of shafts (which was the usual method for a
single-axle carriage), the curricle used a pole attached by springs to a
special bar that lay across the saddles on the horses backs.
The use of the curricle bar made it essential that the two
horses be of exactly the same height and stride. That's why we always hear
about men wanting "matched pairs" for their curricles. It was not purely for aesthetics. With balanced springs and a matched pair of
horses, the result was an easy, buoyant motion – a comfortable carriage.
The sleek design, though, did have aesthetic appeal. The
rounded body was enhanced throughout by elegant curves: the dashboard sloping
gently outward over the horses, the large C springs in the back, the
scooped-out entrances. Hardly any
straight lines to be seen. The earliest models were quite elevated, in the
style of the high-perch phaeton. But by the mid-Regency, more moderate
elevations became the norm. The curricle seated two, rather snugly, and there
was often, but not always, a groom's seat in the rear between the springs, as
seen in the print of the Marquis of Anglesey driving his curricle with a tiger
seated in the rear.
The expense, and difficulty, of finding horses matched in
size and pace and of a quality suited to the curricle made keeping such a
carriage only within the means of the wealthy. And so the carriage makers
spared no expense in making the curricle as decorative as their clients
desired. Dandies and Corinthians drove
curricles in all colors and with all manner or ornament.
Curricles required good driving skills, as they were prone
to accidents. Because of the curricle bar, if one horse lost his footing, both
horses could be brought down, and the driver sent flying. That's why curricle races were heavily wagered.
At high speeds, there was bound to be an accident.
Back to that curricle at the Maidstone Museum.
It is decorated with the arms of Sir Robert Kemp, who died
in 1761. However, both the museum
caretaker and I agreed that it must have belonged to a later baronet, probably
Sir William Robert Kemp, the 9th baronet, who lived until 1804. A curricle of
this style was simply not being made in England in the 1760s. Based on
everything I've read, I would date it to the 1790s.
You can see from the first photo above that there is no
groom's seat in the back. This sometimes required the placement of a quantity
of iron in a box on the rear undercarriage to counteract the weigh of the
driver, whose seat was slightly in front of the axle. I suspect heavy luggage
might have served the same purpose, though it appears in this case that the box
you see did indeed hold iron weights. Beneath the leather flap in the back, you
can see the edge of the sword case.
Even though it is the worse for wear, being over 200 years
old, it is still an elegant-looking vehicle.
Note the padded leather seats, the gadrooned wooden fittings, and the
wonderful carriage lamp. There also
seems to be a closed storage area beneath the seat. I like to think a gentleman would keep a
pistol or two there, to be easy at hand if needed.
Since I was not allowed to climb into it, I took a lot of
photos and made a lot of notes in order to come to some understanding of what
it would have been like to get into it. This is an early curricle, so it is one
of the higher versions.
The first thing one would have to do is step into the iron
stirrup (one on each side) that sits about 14" off the ground. Entering
from the left side, you would place your right foot in the stirrup. Next, you
would place your left foot onto the metal plate that sits 12-13" up from
the stirrup, and about 10" to the left. Then you'd have to sort of swing
your right foot over and up about 6" onto the floor of the carriage. There
are lots of things to hold onto while you climbed in, and I have no doubt a
fashionable gentleman made a point of alighting with quick ease and grace. I
think a woman in long skirts would have had more difficulty, but she, too, must
have developed a special grace for entering all sorts of carriages. The lower
curricles, like the one shown above with the Marquis of Anglesey, would likely
have been more manageable, though the steady hand of a gentlemen would always
And it's a pretty tight seat for two, measuring only about
38-40" across. Very cozy for a ride through Hyde Park,
don't you think?